I have read this article 3 million times and still dont understand what the Rubric is asking me to do. When I read the article it seems to jump around a lot to me.Any help would be greatly appreciated! Rethinking Work -My choice for the selected reading
ENG 122 Module Two Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
This week, you learned about active reading and analysis by looking more closely at a selected reading. In doing so, you uncovered ideas that may have been difficult to identify during your literal reading of the text.
Prompt
To prepare for this assignment, please re-read your selected article and your notes from Module One.
Note: Remember to cite any works you use in your assignment. You will not be graded on the citations; the purpose is just to make certain you are practicing using citations.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Discuss the context of your selected article, the authors purpose, and the style and tone. What have you learned from this early analysis?
Explain how a closer analysis of the authors claim and the writing structure will help you to learn more about your selected reading.
Now that you have discussed the authors purpose for writing the selected reading, do you think the authors writing effectively achieves their purpose? What led you to this conclusion?
In total, the reflection should be three fully developed paragraphs (58 sentences each) in length (consider one section per question). Remember to refer to the rubric below to make sure you are fulfilling the requirements for this assignment.
What to Submit
Save your work in a Word document and include a page with references. It must be written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Module Two Assignment Rubric
CriteriaProficient (100%)Needs Improvement (75%)Not Evident (0%)Value
ContextDiscusses the context of the selected article, the authors purpose, style, and toneShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include the greater context of the selected articleDoes not attempt criterion30
Claim and StructureExplains how a closer analysis of the authors claim and the writing structure will help to learn more about the selected readingShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include an analysis of the structure of the writing that is more cohesive and comprehensiveDoes not attempt criterion30
EffectivenessEvaluates the effectiveness of the writingShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include support of the evaluation of the effectiveness of the writingDoes not attempt criterion30
Articulation of ResponseClearly conveys meaning with grammatical choices, sentence structure, and spelling that demonstrate an understanding of audience and purposeShows progress toward proficiency, but with inconsistencies in grammatical conventions, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readabilityThe submission has critical inconsistencies in grammatical conventions, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas10
Total:100%
